politics from the heart: IS CHENEY ABOUT TO BLOW UP THE BAY BRIDGE?

Having been a 911 truth activist for 5 years, I have serious suspicions about
the Bay Bridge being closed for entire 4 days.

There has been a lot of threats of terrorist attacks coming form the government.
Looks like they are preparing the public. Or else it could be their usual scare
tactics.

On the other hand, Bush’s term is coming to an end. The public is pushing to ban
voting machines. The power of the Bush administration is deteriorating with
major figures resigning, almost daily scandals on the news and constant threat
of impeachment. Their only weapon is fear, it’s their last hope. I can see them
really desperately needing a terrorist attack in the near future. 911 did them a
great deal of good. 911 was, of course, the work of the Bush administration, the
Pentagon, and others connected tightly to the Bush administration. Osama had no
authority to put the US Airforce on stand down. He would have never been able to
rig the World Trade Center with explosives. If you still have doubts about 911
please watch Loose Change at www.loosechange911.com

About 2 weeks before Sept. 11, 2001 electricity was shut down at the World
Trade
Center. That allowed “the terrorists” to bring in explosives past the security
gates. Guess who was in charge of security at the World Trade Center at that
time? Marvin Bush, yes, Bush’s brother. He also replaced the entire security
personnel at the WTC a few weeks prior to 911.

Getting back to the Bay Bridge, it being shut down for 4 entire days sounds
suspicious. They are also demolishing a section of the bridge, so that gives
them a green light to bring in a demolition crew. According to their official
website they are doing seismic safety work which can, as far as I understand,
involve drilling holes in the structure to test it for safety. Also, the new
bridge being close to finished would be a convenient time to blow up the old
one. Don’t quote me on this, but I have also heard that the old Bay Bridge is
not earthquake stable, so if that is true, then it sounds like the World Trade
Center that needed to go because of all the asbestos that it was filled with.
The WTC was an environmental disaster because of the asbestos that it was filled
with. Cleaning it up would have cost an enormous amount of money that no one was
willing to pay. In other words, it sounds like the Bay Bridge is a good
candidate for a “terrorist attack” just like the WTC was.

Another thing that raises suspicion is the collapse of highway 880 in Oakland
this past April and the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge. As far as I am
concerned 880 was an inside job. Gas doesn’t melt steel otherwise your engine in
your car would have long since melted. Because of 911 it became a well known
fact that steel melts at a much higher temperature than gas burns. The story that I read online about the collapse is full of inconsistencies.

Here is the full story:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/29/BAGVOPHQU46.DTL

Here is an exerpt:

“Jennifer Summers, 36, was driving from her costume design job in San Francisco
home to the Oakland hills just before 4 a.m. when she saw black smoke and
realized the freeway was on fire. She quickly pulled off and looped around so
she could see what was going on. When she got out of her car, flames were shooting into the sky over multiple layers of freeway and she could hear loud crackling and explosions.”

Notice the “loud crackling” and “explosions”. Those are typical sounds of
controlled demolition.

The other witness is “Isaac Rodriguez, a 53-year-old sanitation supervisor”. He
says: “It looked like a big slab of plastic because it was melted. It's made of
steel and concrete and it was bent at both angles of the pillar. It really
looked fake.” I am sure that last statement is open for interpretation, but I
pay attention to such statements. He continues: “ No sign of the truck remains
at the scene. One Caltrans worker there early this morning held up his thumb and
forefinger an inch apart to describe how big the tanker is now.” I haven’t heard
of tankers melting down to the ground before.

The same articles later says this: “Witnesses said at the time that the tanker,
which was changing lanes when it skidded out of control, created a 100-foot-tall
fireball after it crashed on the connector between westbound I-80 and eastbound
I-580, which is immediately northeast of the scene of today's crash.”

How come the names of the witnesses are not revealed? They go into lengthy descriptions about the other 2 witnesses who just saw the fire, yet the most important witnesses that supposedly witnessed the actual accident are not revealed at all.

Another strange thing is the driver’s behavior. According to the article, he
talked to Rodriguez and then supposedly took off walking down the highway
looking for a ride to the hospital. This is at 4 AM. “Rodriguez said he
regretted not thinking to send a vehicle up to get the injured man. He and a
coworker stood for some 40 minutes watching the freeway burn.” What about all
the emergency vehicles that were there?

Check out this other article about the same incident:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/30/MNGK8PI1CI1.DTL

In this article Rodriguez, the witness from the sewage plant, says: ”The driver
escaped just before the overhead ramp collapsed.” Later in the article:
“Firefighters soon saw that the upper ramp was buckling, Price said, and by 4:02
-- seven minutes after they arrived -- it had collapsed.” So, if this is true
then the fire trucks were already there 7 minutes or so before the driver came
out of the fire. In this case why didn’t they take care of the driver?

Another fact worth mentioning is that 880 had been briefly closed due to a very
strange accident shortly before the tanker incident.

My partner David saw a brand new looking tanker parked illegally at a highway
split off facing the accident about 36 hours prior to the accident. The tanker
was turned to the side pointing in the direction of the accident. The spot where
it was parked is at a split off triangular dirt area where small cars park
illegally sometimes but never big trucks. We heard about the accident and looked
at the map of where it was parked. It was the closest parking spot to the
accident site. I know it doesn’t make too much sense why they would park it
there. But there are a lot of highway loops and split offs in that immediate
area. It’s so easy to get lost and then end up heading the wrong way on the
wrong highway without a good way to come back. I can see them parking the
vehicle in a convenient spot in advance to avoid confusion.

I went to the scene a few days later to take pictures. One of the supervisors
told me that was the most bizarre collapse he had ever seen. It looked like it
was cut off with a saw on both sides. I was there a few days after the incident.
I was told by the clean up crew that the only thing that was changed was the
little metal plates added to brace the bridge, everything else was exactly the
same. Take a look at the pictures. To me the color of the break up surface looks
odd. I would expect it to be black if it was indeed burned by a gas fire. On the
other hand, if explosives had been used I can see there being small traces of
much hotter fire that would be more light in color. I am not an expert but I did
major in science in college. Science was my big passion for many years. I
encourage those of you who have more expertise to take a look at the photos.

Steel can be melted under pressure (that’s where explosives come in) or in a
furnace where heat has nowhere to escape. The highway is out in the open, so
this cannot possibly be compared to a furnace. The articles mention orange
flames, which are known to be the coldest. The higher the temperature is the
more white the flame becomes. Watch a welder work. The flames are white and
blue, not orange.

As soon as 880 collapsed the mainstream media started screaming about steel
melting from fossil fuel fires and comparing it to 911. I knew they were going
to say that. That seemed to be the whole purpose of this incident, to “prove”
that the WTC really did collapse from the jet fuel fire. The 911 truth movement
used the impossibility of such a phenomenon as a proof of government complicity
and cover up. So this was possibly meant to disprove this point.

And then, the Minneapolis bridge collapse. I haven’t had a chance to take s good
look at it (I have 3 little kids, not much time for conspiracies), but I would
pay attention to it happening shortly after the 880 collapse. I can see these
events being a rehearsal to test out a bridge demolition by “terrorists.” I just
talked to Eric Hufschmid and he said that the Minneapolis bridge collapse looks
a lot like the 880 collapse in Oakland, very suspicious. Watch his 911
documentary here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4618227146744255189

Also realize that both the mayor of San Francisco (Gavin Newsom) and the state
government (the legendary Schwarznegger) are both unelected puppets installed by
Bush and Co. Oakland police department has ties to federal government also.
Weren’t they involved in Cointelpro? Forgive me for not giving more accurate
info on this. I see and read a lot of stuff, and don’t always remember the
sources. I’ve seen Oakland police do a terrorist exercise in Oakland with staged
public unrest and freaky violent police behavior that was also staged. The
public was unaware of the fact that it was staged. I saw it in Alex Jones’s
films (www.infowars.com).

So, the Bay Bridge is between a rock and a hard place. It would be very easy to
imagine an investigation being made impossible if the bridge did get blown up by
so called “terrorists.”

Having said all this I would like to hope that I am wrong, that it is indeed a
legitimate bridge repair work. But if the bridge does get blown up in the near
future don’t buy the “terrorist” story! Investigate, document, take pictures,
samples of soil, water, anything and don’t let them institute marshal law or
sign Patriot Act 3!

If you plan on driving across the bridge tomorrow or any time soon, please,
bring a camera, still camera, video camera, film the top of the bridge while
driving. You can take it home and play it frame by frame. If you get slowed down
in traffic look up at the ceiling, take pictures, examine later. Look for boxes
with explosives, look for anything suspicious. Email me any suspicious evidence:
uncensored911@yahoo.com Post articles on Indymedia. The more we publicize it the
less chance that they will have the nerve to do it.

You might be able to find some demolition videos made by demolition companies on
Youtube or Google video to get an idea of different kinds of devices that might
be used.

So, let’s hope that the 4-day closing of the bridge was really about repairs and
nothing else. And if per chance there was a terrorist action planned by our
government then let’s prevent it from happening before it’s too late.

(The images are of the 880 collapse in Oakland.)

Gypsy Taub
uncensored911@yahoo.com

www.BustTheConsensus.com